Showing posts with label Gallery on Baum. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gallery on Baum. Show all posts

Sunday, July 20, 2014

Spotted: Another Prolific eBay Vendor Of Fake Cartoon Art

(Uhhh... yeah.)

Did Tony Greco move his Gallery on Baum to Minnesota? Ha ha, I don't think so, but the seller "timetreats" on eBay just may give Greco a run for his money for sending out into the world an extraordinary number of dodgy looking celebrity signatures and terrible drawings "by" famous animators.

The resemblance to the Gallery on Baum case is remarkable: modest fan drawings and autographs with no provenance. Each one is sold for cheap, but LOTS of them are sold. The drawings have an unmistakable "all drawn by the same person" look to them. The seller appears to have hard-to-believe numbers of drawings and autographs by certain people (like Grace Slick! So weird!).

And, of course, there's the quality. These are just absolutely laughable:

(I do not believe Friz Freleng drew this)

(Come on, now!)

These are even worse than Gallery on Baum's fakes, and that's saying something. And when I say "fakes" I mean "forgeries," blatantly manufactured with the intent to deceive. Is the seller the forger? Who knows? He/she certainly isn't a very good judge of quality, that's for sure.

I love the obvious defensiveness in the descriptions:

I sell no pre-printed items done by a Xerox machine, printing press, auto-pen, or some other robotic contraption; every item is absolutely self-evident that it was endorsed by human hands. The vast majority of the autographed material that I have listed for sale has been obtained through correspondence with the noted individual. However, some material is obtained through other sources, such as collections that I purchase. Items such as these usually carry no COAs. However, there are authentication resources available where you may acquire some acclaimed-wizards perspective on items. Fundamentally, I hold no degree doctorate in autograph authentication, so I wish to forgo the process myself. So, I have opted to sell these items under the "entertainment piece" criteria; just awesomely-cool-trinkets to adore. Hence the frugal price.

"I can't prove these are real. Can you prove they're fake?" Uh, yeah, by looking at them.

Thursday, January 16, 2014

Forgerypalooza Update! Has The Gallery On Baum Closed Shop? I Think This Is A Wrap-Up.


It's been a while since I've written about Pittsburgh's Gallery on Baum, the storefront gallery and eBay vendor through whose hands flowed an extraordinary number of shoddy, laughable forgeries of cartoon and illustration art. How about an update?

Short answer: they're completely gone, apparently! But let's back up a moment.

First, a reminder: Please recall that I do not know who actually drew the forgeries sold by the Gallery on Baum, and uncovered no evidence whatsoever that Tony Greco, the proprietor, himself drew the forgeries, and never suggested that to be the case. I did, however, definitively prove that the drawings I wrote about were forgeries, using a variety of techniques, such as materials analysis, comparative/historical analysis, expert opinions from artists' estates, family members, and representatives,  testimonials from still living artists (!!), but most of all connoisseurship, which is an ineffable yet real thing that means "knowing what the fuck you are looking at."

So anyway, ha ha, those posts were good! And they got passed around quite a bit in the collectors community, and other people wrote excellent things about the Gallery on Baum's wares as well, just as Cartoon Brew and the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette had before I got into the effort. That all adds up to a massive Google Problem™ for Greco and the GoB; insurmountable, really, at this point.

"yeah, that's a fake." --T. K. Ryan

The GoB persisted for a short time after my series of articles and those by others, but I have a feeling that the heat was on (I also heard of some eBay pranksters who messed with them), and they rather suddenly ran out of obvious forgeries to sell on eBay. *poof* All gone! From that point on, they sold kind of low-rent, typical stuff: a genuine Tumbleweeds strip drawing here, a lackluster Archie animation cel there, etc. They weren't making money hand-over fist (in $50 and $75 dribs and drabs) like they were when they were pumping out all those hundreds (hundreds!) of drawings by that mysterious, unidentified yet super-prolific forger. I saw them try to flip a Tad Dorgan drawing they outbid me for (the nerve!), and they ended up taking a loss (no way I was going to buy it from them!). Hardly seems worth the effort.

Indeed. For several months now they've had zero items (see above) offered on eBay. Their last feedback on the site was last September. As for their storefront gallery, their website hasn't been updated since April of 2012, and their Facebook page appears to be gone. I can't find any evidence of any GoB activity at all recently.

They did, however, come up with a novel way to dispose of two of their more ambitious/egregious forgeries: here is a fake Warhol and here a fake Keith Haring donated by them to some weird (Charity? Fake charity? Do you detect a weird and scammy vibe?) auction that I can't figure out. How generous of them! I can't see any evidence that the pieces ever sold, and I first saw these on the site over a year ago. Note the "attributed to" butt-coverings.

Soooo... maybe that's it? Maybe something happened? Maybe Tony Greco has simply removed himself completely from the cartoon/illustration/animation art sales world amid ever diminishing returns? That would be nice. I hope that's so, because only one of the following statements can be true: either he is a prolific forger who intentionally duped his customers, or he was so inept a dealer as to have no apparent knowledge whatsoever of the presence of massive numbers of obvious, terrible forgeries in his inventory. In both cases a successful –yet totally inept– forger makes out like... well, like a bandit.

Either way, good riddance. Too bad about all those terrible, fake drawings floating around out there! They'll be popping up like bad pennies for decades to come. Fun!

Thursday, January 02, 2014

Caveat Emptor

(Image via eBay. Buy it now!)

It's been a while since I've written about fakes, copies, and forgeries in comic art, but this drawing currently offered on eBay is such a useful case study, I can't pass it up.

First of all, is it a drawing by Charles Schulz? Goodness, no! The Lucy is pretty good, but Schroeder's face looks like it's melting. Also note how the artist misunderstood the division between sock and shoelace. It doesn't pass the "glance test" even for a moment. Also, Schulz always signed his work. Always.

So is it a forgery? I doubt it. It's hard to imagine a forger leaving off the signature.This is without a doubt a drawing made by a Peanuts fan for their own enjoyment, probably in the mid 1960s (what I call Schulz's "jut-jaw" period). I made many such drawings myself, as did thousands of other kids around the world.This drawing, then, is similar to the peculiar Mutt and Jeff copy I posted here.

So is the seller aware of this? Is the seller knowingly trying to pass off this period copy as the real thing? Again, I doubt it. The seller appears to mostly deal with railroad spikes, so they're basically just out of their depth here. Perhaps the seller found the drawing tucked in a book in a thrift store? Something like that, no doubt.

So this is a case where the creator of the drawing never intended it to be a forgery, and years later it pops up on eBay, offered by a seller who doesn't know what he/she's got. Simple enough. No crimes committed, and no intent to deceive detected! A dishonest seller would have added a signature to transform the copy into an ex post facto forgery (I've seen examples of this).

But that doesn't obscure the fact that there's a non-genuine Schulz drawing listed on eBay for $5,000! I'll repeat the lesson from my earlier posts: if you're going to collect comic art, stick with published work. Stay away from "convention sketches" and other casual doodles. Even when they're genuine, they're problematic, difficult to prove, and rarely end up being worth anything.

Oh, and Happy New Year!

Tuesday, June 25, 2013

Facebook Users: A Favor, Please?


For some reason, my post about Gallery on Baum's terrible Ernie Bushmiller forgery is getting a lot of hits via Facebook today. Since I don't have a Facebook account (I know, right?), I can't figure out where it's coming from. Can some Pony Pal track down this FB post and tell me what's going on?

Thank  you!

In thanks, I'll post a recently acquired *real* 1959 Bushmiller drawing, featuring Aunt Fritzi in a negligee, tomorrow.

UPDATE: it might be a user named Shaun Clancy? Or Terry Beatty? Again, I can't see this stuff, so screenshots would be greatly appreciated.

UPDATE: Thanks much to Pony Pal Nelly, who located the post by Terry Beatty.

I ended up laying off Gallery on Baum, because despite my best efforts, few people seemed to care, and that includes the law enforcement officials who simply ignored my efforts to expose this fraud. :( I regard this as a personal and professional failure. DOUBLE :(

However, I just looked at GoB's eBay page, and everything they're selling at the moment is genuine, so maybe they've cut it out with the forgeries? I like to think I gave them enough of a "Google Problem™" to put an end to their vending of forgeries. So perhaps that's a victory of sorts after all?

UPDATE AGAIN: Terry Beatty, a very talented cartoonist,  responded in the comments to this post. Perhaps we can revamp this investigation? I'm frankly pessimistic, but we'll see.

Thursday, March 29, 2012

Art Collection: Rat Fink Drawing By Ed "Big Daddy" Roth, 1991/2

Click for bigger.

This is the kind of thing that PSP punching bag Gallery on Baum sells: quick sketches made on the run by famous artists for fans. The main difference between this one and many of those sold by the GoB, however, is that this one is genuine.

So how do I know that? What makes me so sure? It certainly isn't a very attractive drawing of Rat Fink by any means. The inscription makes no sense. The glossy paper and sharpie aren't typical cartoonist's tools. It isn't published art, so you can't compare it to a printed source. How can I be so cocky as to declare this to be the work of Ed "Big Daddy" Roth, and not just some imitator with a sharpie and a light box? Easy: because I watched him draw it from two feet away, and then he handed it to me. OK, fair enough. So how do YOU know it's genuine?

You just have to trust me. Ha ha!

OK, so, the story:

I was in Seattle promoting and presenting the Festival of Animation's "Sick and Twisted" show in in 1991 or 1992. For some reason, Ed Roth was in town, and simply showed up one night. I was stunned. I had always been a fan of his work, and knew what he looked like. Ed wasn't interested in seeing the show, because he was a devout Mormon and didn't want to see obscene cartoons (fair enough, but ironic considering the disgustingness of Rat Fink). What he really wanted to talk about was getting in touch with Spike and Mike, the FoA's producers, and getting them to finance a Rat Fink film. To tell you the truth, it was hard making much sense of what he was saying... he was a really strange guy. But he kept going on and on about wanting Rat Fink to be computer animated, which just absolutely baffled me (think back to what computer animation looked like around this time). I promised I would pass along his interests to Spike and Mike, and I believe they did end up talking to him, but also couldn't make head or tails of what he wanted to do, so nothing came of it.

Before Roth scooted out of the auditorium, I blurted out, like a schoolgirl, "I'm such a big fan! Could I possibly trouble you for an autograph before you leave?" All I had, unfortunately, was a sharpie and a blank piece of glossy magazine stock, but I was thrilled when "Big Daddy" whipped out Rat Fink in about five seconds. The word balloon, "Ike! Make me move!" refers to his desire for Spike and Mike to produce a Rat Fink cartoon.

But you still have to trust me on this one. After all, Tony Greco at the Gallery on Baum has a talent for spinning tales about the dubious drawings in his collection, too.

Tuesday, March 27, 2012

Forgerypalooza: Pop Quiz

Below is a sketch done for a fan by Katzenjammer Kids artist Harold Knerr in 1945:


And below is a drawing just listed on eBay by the Gallery on Baum attributed to the same artist working in the same year:


Now, Pony Pals™, the quiz: using just the evidence before you and what you've learned over the past several weeks on this blog, how would you characterize the second drawing shown above?

UPDATE: Here's another one, also from 1945. Compare/contrast:


One of these things is not like the others!

Monday, March 26, 2012

Follow-Up: How Does Gallery On Baum Feel About PSP Forgery Investigation? A Sockpuppet Speaks!

You may recall the terrible Ernie Bushmiller forgery I wrote about at the beginning of my investigation of the many, many fake drawings sold by the Gallery on Baum. Shortly after my point-by-point breakdown of why the drawing is not genuine, in which I used multiple techniques to prove that 1. the drawing was traced, and 2. the drawing was not traced by Ernie Bushmiller, a Pony Pal contacted the GoB through eBay, and very shortly thereafter the listing ended under mysterious circumstances.Suddenly, the auction was over, two days early, and the drawing was sold (as well as a particularly bad Popeye drawing which I criticized in the same post), even though it hadn't been a "buy it now" listing. I immediately suspected that the drawing had "fake sold" in order to get it off eBay without it appearing as if it had been withdrawn.

A decent interval later, the "buyer" left feedback on the dubious purchase, which allowed me to see who the buyer was. To backtrack a bit, lately I've been using eBays feedback pages to contact buyers of some of the confirmed fakes sold by the Gallery on Baum, alerting them to the nature of their purchases. These buyers were alarmed, generally, but thanked me and contacted Gallery on Baum for refunds, which were immediately given with no questions asked.

Just for fun, I thought I'd send a similar message to the "buyer" of the Bushmiller fake, knowing that I was probably writing to the Gallery on Baum themselves. One of the best pieces of evidence that this buyer was also the seller is that this same buyer recently purchased a "Spy vs. Spy" rough sketch which, shortly afterwards, ended up on sale in GoB's listings. So anyway, well aware that I was wading into unfriendly waters, I sent my message:

I just thought you should know that the Ernie Bushmiller drawing you recently purchased from Gallery on Baum is a forgery. Please see here:
[link]
You may wish to Google "Gallery on Baum" and "fake" to learn a lot more. I'm not saying they make the forgeries themselves, but a large number of the drawings they sell are fakes. I'm an expert on Ernie Bushmiller's work, and I can assure you that he did not draw that picture.

Now like I said, I've contacted several people who have purchased fakes from the GoB, and they've all gotten refunds, so Tony Greco must be pretty angry at me these days, so I was hardly surprised by the fury in the response from the fake buyer of the fake Bushmiller:

First, after I had received the Sluggo piece, I was pleasantly surprised that it was in better condition than I'd anticipated.

Then, after receiving your email I decided to do my own research. I showed it to two of my own experts in the field and both confirmed it was definitely authentic. I value their opinion much more than yours. First because each of them actually closely examined the piece in person. Secondly, these are two gentlemen, residing in Palm Beach, FL. who, in the past 25 years of authenticating as well as purchasing several pieces of art through auctions on my behalf, have never steered me wrong.

I then researched Greco and found he has many different interests and also has appeared on various shows highlighting his numerous collections. You do not speak of any of these positive aspects of Greco and his Gallery, only negative remarks based solely on your opinion. He must have some credibility knowing Heffner [sic] so well and frequenting the Playboy Mansion.

I also discovered he has a very large Munster collection. I don’t understand why one would jeopardize their gallery, reputation, and collections by selling inexpensive “fake” artwork. I've come across many forgeries in my lifetime, but on a much larger scale.

I then read through your blog. This confirmed that you speak negatively regarding mostly everyone. Making fun of how people dress? Not very positive and a bit insecure on your behalf I might add.

I should report you to EBay for contacting me and making false accusations without substantial evidence other than your self-proclaimed expertise, as well as causing an added expense on my behalf in authenticating the item.

After I stopped rolling around on the floor in fits of laughter, I simply responded:

Well then, I'm glad you're happy with your purchase.

Ha ha ha. In the immortal words of Bugs Bunny, ain't I a stinker?

Friday, March 16, 2012

John Hart Studios Confirms That Gallery On Baum's BC & Wizard Of Id Drawings Are Forgeries


What do the three "Johnny Hart" and "Brant Parker" drawings shown in this post have in common? If you guessed, "They were all drawn by the same person," or "They were all sold to satisfied, positive-feedback-leaving customers by the Gallery on Baum," or "They're all fakes," then you've been paying attention. Well done! You can see the eBay listings for these comic strip manqués here, here, and here.


But don't just take my word for it. Simply ask Patti Pomeroy, daughter of late BC creator Johnny Hart, who kindly took the time to confirm to me that, in her words, "These are not genuine."


At this point in my ongoing investigation of the Gallery on Baum, it has actually become a bit more of a challenge to identify examples of genuine, non-forgeries in their collection.

More to come!

UPDATE: Just to escalate this investigation to a new level, I contacted the buyer of two of the drawings above and informed him of my findings. The buyer contacted GoB, who instantly offered, with no questions asked, a full refund, as well as shipping and even return shipping charges. This is not the reaction one would expect from somebody unaware they had sold fakes.

Monday, March 12, 2012

Art Collection: Amateur Copy Of Mutt & Jeff Comic Strip, Ca. 1921

(Click for larger)

I've really been having a lot of fun showing you and writing about all the crazy cartoon art forgeries pumped out into the collectors' market by the hundreds (literally!) by the Gallery on Baum. Not only are the forgeries interesting (and kind of sad) in and of themselves, but they've served as a jumping off point concerning all sorts of aspects of cartoon art, how it's made, how it's marketed, and how it isn't always what it appears to be to the untrained eye. So far I've shown you forgeries on the one hand, and fakes (like Virgil Ross's ersatz "model sheets"), which aren't necessarily forgeries, on the other. But there's a third kind of non-genuine cartoon artwork to look out for: the copy.

This time I'm going to show you something from my own collection, seen above. I bought it on eBay for dirt cheap knowing full well it wasn't a genuine Bud Fisher Studios Mutt and Jeff drawing (like this one, also in my collection), and the eBay seller didn't misrepresent the piece; he knew there was something very "off" about it.

So how did I know this drawing wasn't genuine? Besides the clumsy quality of the drawing, the real tip-off here was the size: it's only 5" x 15", or just about the same size as the strip appeared in the newspaper. Newspaper cartoonists always worked larger than scale, and in the case of Mutt and Jeff, a LOT larger (original drawings from this period measure a whopping 11.5" x 30"). Furthermore, the support for the drawing isn't a proper illustration board, but a cheap, stiff piece of white-faced cardboard which, as you can see, has deteriorated badly, a veritable geyser of acid, foxing, and wood pulp. This is not a cartoonist's board.

The next step was to find the original Mutt and Jeff strip as it ran in the newspaper, and here it is, from June, 1921:

(Click for larger)

Is the small version some kind of direct tracing from the newspaper strip? No, it's not very faithful at all. Here's a section of both drawings superimposed:


Not even close. And there's another big difference: the copyist changed the name of the town from "Hokey" to "Frederick." And, finally, the copyist didn't include Fisher's signature in his drawing.

So what is this weird, small comic strip drawing? Basically, it's simply an amateur fooling around. Perhaps this budding artist enjoyed comics and one day thought, "I'm going to try to do one of those," and then did so, substituting his own town to personalize the piece.  Or perhaps somebody was reading this particular Mutt and Jeff and thought, "That reminds me of my friend who is always going on and on about his hometown. I'm going to draw a version of this for him."

So this isn't a forgery, as it wasn't created with the intent to deceive, otherwise the name of the town wouldn't be changed and there would be a signature. And it isn't exactly a fake, either. It's simply a clumsy freehand copy innocently made for fun.

What it also is, however, is old, probably from around the same time as the original, and probably copied directly from the newspaper (how would the artist know the title, otherwise?). And I imagine that somewhere along the line in the last 90 (!) years before it came to the dealer who sold it to me, previous owners probably didn't recognize that it was a copy. I bet it was regarded as a genuine Mutt and Jeff drawing for decades.

And there are more copies like this out there, although I've never before seen a copy of an entire strip. A lot of fans and inspired amateurs tried to make drawings of their favorite cartoon characters, again with no intent to deceive, but these amateur drawings age, and they change hands, and if the copyist is talented... well, then, there's another good recipe for confusion and misattribution in the cartoon art market. And I've seen at least one case where an old fan drawing later had a forged signature added to it, so combo copies/forgeries also exist. Beware.

The moral of this story is, once again, to stick with verifiable published art. And this case shows that sometimes something seems to be genuine published art until you look closer and add up all the factors.

Gallery on Baum update: since my last post, GoB has added to their eBay store a Broom Hilda forgery, a Frank and Ernest forgery, and a particularly egregious James Montgomery Flagg forgery which looks completely unlike anything he ever drew, ever

Sunday, March 11, 2012

Virgil Ross, Fakes, and Forgeries In Animation Art

(Most images in this post can be clicked for larger versions.)

Virgil Ross was one of the busiest and most gifted and facile animators in the history of the medium. He is mainly celebrated for the dozens of classic cartoons he animated at Warner Bros. during the 30s, 40s, and 50s for legendary directors Tex Avery, Bob Clampett, and Friz Freleng, including such classic WB masterpieces as A Wild Hare, Baseball Bugs, and the Oscar winning Knighty Knight Bugs. He not only made some of the most famous cartoon characters move, he also contributed to the development of the characters themselves, serving as a master "model sheet" draftsman for the studio.


The images shown above are just two examples of many fan sketches attributed to Virgil Ross either for sale currently or sold in the past by the Gallery on Baum in Pittsburgh, PA. First of all, let's get something out of the way immediately: these drawings simply don't pass the glance test, and by the glance test I mean when somebody who knows his stuff (me, in this case) simply glances at something and says, "No way." This is what is known as connoisseurship. I feel perfectly comfortable merely glancing at these photographs of drawings and saying they are fakes. They're that obviously, blatantly bad.

So what are my Warner Bros. animation bona fides?  Simply put: I'm a cartoon geek. You all know that already. More than that, however, I worked on the animated film festival circuit for years, met countless animators, and in the early 90s I co-produced and co-curated a Bugs Bunny film festival which toured the nation. During this tour, when the festival played in Orange County, California, and Los Angeles, I was honored to meet and dine with Chuck Jones and his daughter/manager Linda Jones, and got to visit their gallery in Corona del Mar. Imagine what a treat it was to hear Mr. Jones tell stories of the Termite Terrace days, his long-term memory crystal clear. At dinner, he also honored me by drawing a perfect Daffy Duck in my journal. The drawing (since lost; I don't want to talk about it) was fast, loose, expressive... alive.



On that same trip, I briefly met... this post's subject, Virgil Ross! He was very old, but affable and obviously thrilled to be at a bustling movie theater filled with people enjoying his work on the big screen, where it belongs. I also saw a drawing of Bugs Bunny Mr. Ross made for my coworker, and just like the sketch Chuck Jones had made for me, it was super-fast and assured, loose and sketchy yet extremely accurate, and with that "spark of life" that only a master animator can breathe into a drawing. And both these drawings, Jones's and Ross's, were made on-the-fly with no reference materials. Basically, those guys could draw those characters in their sleep.

I see none of that in the "Virgil Ross" drawings sold by the Gallery on Baum, shown above. These are rote, leaden, laborious, clumsy. Furthermore, they all appear to be traced, and Ross hardly needed to trace to draw the characters he had helped develop and then animate via tens of thousands of drawings made over several decades. Let's take a look at a case study. Here's another "Virgil Ross" fake, this one a much better effort by whoever drew it, sold just days ago by the Gallery on Baum:


I've already discussed some of the hallmarks of tracings in this series, but the most telling indicator that this drawing is a tracing is that every single line in it has a blunt end; in other words, none of the lines are fast, and therefore do not have the thin, trailing edges which indicate quick pencil work. The next step was to see if I could find the source from which this was traced, and that was easy enough. Here is a model-sheet-style drawing of Pepe le Pew by Virgil Ross, sold for $262.90 in 2010 by Heritage Auctions, and currently available on eBay for an inflated $899 from Comic-Mint:

(Again, you can click all these images for larger versions.)

I'm going to go ahead and turn the Gallery on Baum faux-Ross drawing red and superimpose it onto the Heritage/Comic-Mint version to demonstrate that the former is a tracing from (a photo of) the latter:


Note that the Heritage/Comic-Mint drawing is full of those thin, trailing edges from the fast pencil lines, most tellingly on Pepe's face and, damningly, the letters of the signature. (The Marvin the Martian drawing above also comes from one of these Heritage/Comic-Mint drawings.)

The signature was done on a slightly different scale, but also matches up suspiciously well:


Now here's where things get complicated, and we confront some ugly truths about the "Animation Collectibles" industry. That "genuine" Virgil Ross Pepe le Pew model sheet is kind of a fake, too. It's not a real, production model sheet made in the 40s as a guide for animators, but a facsimile of one made especially for the burgeoning animation art market in the 1980s and 90s. The current owner of the drawing, Comic-Mint, dates it to the early 90s, and that seems about right to me. Did Virgil Ross really draw it? Yeah, why not. But he was ollllld by this time, and that accounts for the fact that these drawings, too, aren't all that great. Ross apparently made a whole series of these ersatz "model sheets" around this time (see a bunch of them in the archives at Heritage), although I don't know who for; I'm assuming for a specialty animation art gallery who offered him a good deal. Ross signed up for a lot of this shit.*

So why was Virgil Ross making these kinda fakey things, basically forgeries of his own work? Ha, well, for a buck. Why not? Plus, there was demand for it, because animation art became really "hot" in the 80s and 90s. Too hot. There was a huge demand, but not enough genuine, surviving production art to fill it. The survival rate for authentic production art from Warner Bros. cartoons was particularly poor: the studio had routinely scrubbed cels clean for re-use, and seemed to love nothing more than to shovel archived drawings and artwork into furnaces. This lack of product created a vacuum into which various kinds of forgers and fakers were sucked, and in many cases the fakers were old-timers like Virgil Ross, who were only too happy to draw Bugs Bunny again for a decent paycheck.

And that's why the animation art industry more or less crashed in the late 90s, because so many galleries pumped out so much fake and semi-fake junk, from the ersatz model sheets drawn by real animators like Virgil Ross, to the whole "limited edition cel" scam, wherein mass-produced serigraphs (glorified silkscreens, basically) which looked like real production cels were sold to collectors who didn't really understand the difference. My dentist has this crap on the walls of his office, doesn't yours? These things clog the market today, and their values have plummeted to well under what they sold for when brand new. Genuine production artwork prices have gone down, too, but not nearly as much, because good production art is rare.

So here's the unfortunate fact about collecting genuine Warner Bros. animation art which has been true since the 1980s: unless you are rich, you are not going to get anything good. That is a fact.

But let's get back to the Gallery on Baum, seller of many bad, fake Virgil Ross drawings (and many bad, fake Friz Freleng drawings). Not only are these things forgeries, drawn by whom I do not know, and not only are they tracings, but they are tracings from things that are kind of fake to begin with!

And that's yet another reason why if you don't know what you're doing, and if you aren't really obsessive and observant, or willing to put in the time to read about a million books, collecting cartoon art probably isn't for you, and you'll get burned, just like all those people who have purchased fake drawings from the Gallery on Baum.

To be continued!

*From ASIFA's bio of Virgil Ross:

As his career wound down, he returned to projects involving the old Warner Bros. characters. He also spent some of his time doing work for galleries and attending opening of Warner Bros. stores which featured his artwork.

Heck, he deserved it.

Friday, March 09, 2012

Another Day, Another Gallery On Baum Forgery Proven


Do you know Shag's work? He is a prolific Los Angeles painter and illustrator (real name: Josh Agle) who works in an appealing retro graphic style. He is also a very talented draftsman and a superb designer... but you wouldn't know that from looking at the drawing above from Gallery on Baum's collection!

But, of course, the Gallery on Baum's drawing is irrelevant, because –surprise!– it's yet another forgery. How do I know? Because his agent just emailed me to confirm it!

Up next from the GoB hall of shame: one of the greatest draftsmen in the history of animated film... or was he?

Thursday, March 08, 2012

Chris Browne Confirms That Gallery On Baum's Hägar the Horrible Drawings Are Also Fakes

Hurry, there are only five days left to purchase this drawing of Hägar the Horrible from Gallery on Baum's eBay store (screenshot of the auction page has been archived)! GoB describes it as an "Original Hagar the Horrible drawing by Dik Browne on medium paper stock 4 1/4" x 5 3/4". Done in marker. Nice detailing."

Unlike T. K. Ryan, Dik Browne is no longer with us to confirm whether or not he did this lackluster drawing, or, for that matter, this one or this one, previously sold to satisfied customers on eBay by Gallery on Baum.

Fortunately, all we need to do is ask Dik Browne's son, cartoonist Chris Browne, who assisted his father on Hägar and took over the strip upon his death:

Hi, Mr. Browne:

I've been investigating a cartoon art dealer, Tony Greco of The Gallery on Baum in Pittsburgh, who is notorious for selling a lot of fake drawings.

Currently he has a suspicious-looking "Dik Browne" Hagar drawing for sale on eBay, and I was wondering if you think this is your father's work:

[link]

Here's another one he sold recently:

[link]

And another:

[link]

So are these fakes, or did your father draw them while being smothered with a pillow?

Thanks, and keep up the good work!

To which Mr. Browne kindly replied:

Dear Peter,

This was really interesting to see- thanks! You're right, these were not drawn by my dad (or me for that matter). Interestingly the signatures are pretty good, but those aren't by him either. Probably traced from one of his cartoons or books. Really rather sad to think of someone scamming people like this. Crime in all it's many forms betrays a lack of character and imagination.

Thank you for sharing!

Best wishes, Chris Browne

So how many pieces of art from Tony "If one's fake, they're all fake" Greco's collection have we now conclusively demonstrated to be forgeries? I've already lost count.

On the other hand, just to show an even-handed approach, underground cartoonist Jay Lynch confirmed to me that this piece offered by Gallery on Baum is... genuine!

Wednesday, March 07, 2012

Cartoon Forgerypalooza: A Clarification

I want to clarify some things about this ongoing series of posts about the fake cartoon art sold by the Gallery on Baum: First, I want to make it crystal clear that I have not found any evidence whatsoever that Tony Greco and/or the Gallery on Baum are themselves manufacturing the forgeries they sell. For all I know, they could be the victims, here (honestly, though, I doubt it). I have absolutely no way of determining that. I don't know Mr. Greco personally, nor have I physically visited his gallery in Pittsburgh. I have not seen any of these drawings in person. All I know is what I see in the drawings, what I've read elsewhere, and what I know about cartoon art myself. I'm not accusing them of being forgers; I am accusing them of selling forgeries. And I know that they have denied doing so.

The reason why I am writing about this is because I am an obsessive fan of the art of the comic strip, and to a lesser extant, that of animation. As a collector who knows what he's doing, I think eBay is a great place to buy superb, genuine cartoon art, so I personally dislike seeing the water muddied with bad junk.

And last but not least, this series of articles has absolutely nothing to do whatsoever with my place of employment. This is a purely personal project.

Basically, when I saw that Ernie Bushmiller fake, I felt like a trap had been set for me, personally. And that pissed me off.

Photo: Bugs Bunny "by Friz Freleng" presented without comment.

Also: there's an update with more info from Mark Newgarden in the Bushmiller forgery post.

T. K. Ryan Confirms That Gallery On Baum's T. K. Ryan Drawing Wasn't Drawn By T. K. Ryan


The parade of Tony Greco's fraudulent cartoon art atrocities continues! Above is an item described on Gallery on Baum's ebay listing as an "Original Tumbleweeds & Hildegarde Hamhocker drawing by T.K. Ryan on medium card stock 6 3/4" x 7 1/4". Done in ink and marker. Highly detailed!"

This one is laughably easy to debunk, because Tumbleweeds creator T. K. Ryan, unlike most of the artists represented by forged drawings in GoB's collection, is still alive. So I emailed him:

Mr. Ryan:

I came across a drawing attributed to you offered by a seller on eBay who is known to sell a lot of fakes. Can you tell me if the following is your work? [link]

To which he graciously replied:

thanks, Peter...yeah, that's a fake...best wishes, TKRyan

To quote Tony Greco himself, "If one's a fake, they're all fake," so I'm going to go ahead and declare all the other godawful Tumbleweeds sketches he's sold to happy, positive-feedback-leaving customers (1 2 3, etc.) to be forgeries as well.

And no offense to Mr. Ryan, but selling Tumbleweeds forgeries? That's low.

Finally, it should be obvious by now that the "T. K. Ryan", the "Bill Hanna", and the "Bushmiller" drawings I've exposed here were all drawn by the same person.

(Note: I just added a "Gallery on Baum" topic tag so that it's easy to track this story on PSP. I'm not done yet!)

Tuesday, March 06, 2012

I'm Sick Of Looking At Gallery On Baum's Awful Nancy Forgery, So Let's Look At A Different Forgery From Their Collection!

Yesterday I was really on a tear about Gallery on Baum's atrocious ersatz Bushmiller drawing. Pony Pal™ Nixie Bunny, the naughty thing, sent the post to GoB as feedback through eBay, and guess what happened next? The auction suddenly ended two days early! With a buyer! Even though it wasn't a "buy it now" item! I am at a loss to interpret these events.

One commenter this morning basically said thank you, PSP, may I have another? Well, others seemed to enjoy the post, and I aim to please (every once in a while), so let's look at another embarrassing forgery from the Gallery on Baum. I'm not on as solid footing for this one (I know my Bushmiller!), and my theories here are more conjectural, but let's look at this drawing:

Click above for bigger, worse.

Shown above is what GoB purports to be an "Original Bill Hanna Flintstones drawing from The Man Called Flintstone featuring Fred. On paper stock 8 1/2" x 11". Done in marker. Nice detailing."

Personally, I think "nice detailing" is a matter of opinion, because just like the other dubious cartoon artworks in GoB's collection, this is an absolutely terrible drawing. Bill Hanna, of Hanna-Barbera fame, just like Ernie Bushmiller, simply was not capable of drawing this badly. Honestly, that's all the real evidence you need to know that this is a fake. I think Cartoon Brew put it best in their take-down of a different GoB Hanna forgery (!) when they said, "This appears to be from the days when Hanna would attend comic conventions and draw characters blindfolded to entertain his fans."

Is this, like the Bushmiller, another tracing? Yes!  What's the source image? That's easy enough, the front cover/promotional artwork for the DVD release of The Man Called Flintstone:


OK, it's flipped and the mouth in the drawing is closed. Otherwise, let's do an overlay and see how well they match up:


That looks close enough to me. The drawing is a tracing from this promotional image. It didn't take much effort for the tracer to flip the original in Photoshop or to change the mouth to closed. But here's the thing: that image is not the original artwork used for original 1966 release of The Man Called Flintstone. Here, for instance, is the original poster art:

And here is a lobby card:


Neither of those images of Fred are very good, so it would be understandable for Warner Bros. to want a better image for the DVD and promotional materials. Now here's where the theorizing begins: I believe the Fred Flintstone image used on the video cover was specially made for the DVD release. Tvshowsondvd.com tells us that this DVD was initially announced with this cover artwork in 2004. Presumably it would have been in development for a year or so, so the new artwork was probably created in 2003 or 2004, possibly 2002 at the earliest, but that's a stretch (I mean, c'mon, it's an obscure Flintstones video release, not the type of thing that requires tons of effort).

Oh, and Bill Hanna? Bill Hanna who supposedly drew that Gallery on Baum Fred Flintstone which, as we've seen, was traced from this circa 2003-2004 artwork?

He died in 2001. Oops!*

Any new offerings from Gallery on Baum on eBay? Sure, all the time! Today you can get all excited and start bidding on this drawing of Daffy Duck, apparently executed (and I mean killed DEAD) by Friz Freleng while he was jumping up and down on a trampoline. Neat!

*Frightening alternative theory: the drawing was traced by a terrifying (but generous to his fans!) reanimated zombie Bill Hanna. That would explain the shakiness!

Monday, March 05, 2012

Gallery On Baum's Bushmiller Forgery: Let's Take A Closer Look, Shall We?

Ohhh... why does this piss me off so much? I guess it's because I'm so fond of Bushmiller's work that I hate to see it misrepresented by such a bad drawing. Here's the Gallery on Baum's fake (Yes, I am saying that: fake, fake, fake, and intended to deceive) Bushmiller which I wrote about this morning on the right, and the genuine panel from his 1957 Sunday strip on the left:


Goodness, those are awfully close (NOT in quality, mind you). How well do they match up? Let's turn the original blue and the fake red and overlap them:


It's positively uncanny! No, it's not uncanny: it's a tracing done on a lightbox. But could it be a tracing by Bushmiller himself? Ask this question: why would he do this? If Bushmiller were to dash off a quick sketch for a fan, why would he lug out a lightbox instead of... well, dashing off a quick sketch? Also, if Bushmiller himself were doing the tracing, one would expect him to understand his own drawing and not make what are called "tracing errors." Does the Gallery on Baum's drawing include tracing errors? Oh, yes, that and more. Let's really get into this:

(Click to open a larger version in a new window and play along at home!)

  1. On the left, the horizontal lines in the building are Bushmiller's visual shorthand for "planks of wood," misunderstood by the tracer as simply shading lines, which he doesn't feel a need to follow exactly.
  2. Note that where the tracer doesn't feel a need to exactly follow the original, as in the bushes and the shading lines on the building mentioned above, the lines are fast and assured. Where the tracer feels more of a need to follow the original contours closely, such as in Sluggo's outline, the lines are shakier and slower, less sure. These are elementary aspects of tracings, and once you get used to spotting them, you'll notice traced drawings everywhere, like this Warhol.
  3. Tracing error: Bushmiller uses two separate lines to delineate the collar of Sluggo's shirt and his left hand. The tracer misinterprets this as a single, continuous line.
  4. Tracing error: the crease in the pants caused by the bend in Sluggo's knee in the original is misinterpreted as... Sluggo's bulging crotch? Ew.
  5. After decades of drawing Sluggo, "Bushmiller" suddenly forgets how he has always drawn his ear.
  6. The tracer says to himself, "Stupid Bushmiller should have put shading there!"
  7. On the left is Bushmiller's visual shorthand for "edge of the sidewalk and grass." On the right is "Bushmiller" suddenly forgetting how he has been doing this for decades.
  8. This is probably the most damning detail: "Bushmiller" suddenly starts constructing the letter "B" in a totally different way than he has been doing for decades.
  9. And here is "Bushmiller" suddenly forgetting how to draw the same shoes he's been drawing over and over on a daily basis for years and years and years.

I could probably come up with at least five more points, but I think I've already belabored the obvious here.

And don't even get me started on the signature.

One last thing: Could Gallery on Baum's drawing be a rough sketch for the final strip? No: Bushmiller's rough sketches didn't look anything like this, and he didn't make them on index cards with felt-tip markers.

UPDATE: Bushmiller authority Mark Newgarden (and co-author with Paul Karasik
of the upcoming HOW TO READ NANCY)  has this to add about the drawing:

As far as we can tell EB never owned a light box.

His real drawings for fans were nothing like this. They are usually quite
tight and often water colored-and never drawn in a ruled panel (let alone
one taken from a daily strip!)

Click on the "Gallery on Baum" topic tag below for more in this series.

Random Nancy Panel Forgery


Oh, hello! Sorry I've been away, but I've had this really nasty cold, so... well, whatever. So much coughing! It wasn't pretty.

And neither is this absolutely terrible fake Ernie Bushmiller drawing (see above) for sale on eBay. I feel sad for whomever buys it (a well-known Bushmiller expert told me, "I could do a better forgery asleep in the bathtub."). Curious, I looked at the seller's other offerings, and found a panoply of obvious fakes (such as this one, this one, and this one) by big names mixed in with real works by small names.

Turning to the Googles, I found out that this guy, Tony Greco, proprietor of the Gallery on Baum, is perhaps the most brazen seller of forged drawings in the specialized cartoon/animation art market. Several blogs have revealed the astonishing extent and laughably poor quality of his offerings (see here and here, for instance), and even the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette got into the act a couple of years ago in an extensive article in which the author never comes right out and calls him a crook, but it's easy enough to read between the lines, especially when representatives of the Warhol and Charles Schulz estates aren't so coy about their opinions. My favorite part of the article is where Greco denies drawing the stuff himself, claiming, "I can't draw a straight line." LOL, well, see the fake Bushmiller above for a nice backup of that statement.*

So what are we to learn from all this? First: don't buy a Picasso, Miró, or Dalí on eBay, OK? But most of Greco's fakes are more modest items: so-called "convention sketches" on small cards by cartoonists and animators. Even genuine examples of these types of drawings are usually minor items, done for fans on the fly over bustling tables crowded by onlookers, not the best circumstances for careful draftsmanship. That's how Greco gets away with it: he excuses the poor quality of the drawings by "admitting" that they are minor curiosities with, after all, affordable price tags. It's a pretty good scam! Need I remind you that if something seems too good to be true, it probably isn't?

In conclusion, if you wish to collect cartoon art, stay away from "convention sketches" and unpublished art unless you get them directly from the artist (here's a good example of a safe buy), and even if you do, don't expect them to ever be worth much or to be able to resell them unless you've got solid documentation (many fans at conventions now take quick digital snapshots of the artists while they're drawing the pieces).

And one final note: Greco has a 100% positive rating on eBay. For selling fake after fake after fake!

*I'm guessing Greco (or the trained chimp he employs) uses some sort of opaque projector to create his wares, or at the very least a lightbox; the draftsmanship is so poor that I doubt it's freehand.

UPDATE: Greco just listed another piece, an astonishingly bad Popeye drawing "by Bud Sagendorf." Sagendorf could have drawn a better Popeye with his feet! Unbelievable.

UPDATE: Just for fun, I sent Gallery on Baum a "feedback request" on eBay:
Sooooo... you guys know this can't possibly be genuine, right? Not genuine Bushmiller, anyway.
To which they responded, hilariously:
Thanx
Oooh, Thanx with an "x"! How strange that they sound so unconcerned! It's almost like I was telling them something they already knew!

UPDATE: evidence of forgery belabored tiresomely here.