Oh, god, I know, I know... I shouldn't pay any attention to Meghan McCain, and I shouldn't pay attention to Twitter, and I shouldn't use song titles for post headlines. Sue me.
But I just thought you should see the caricature Megs is using as the background for her Twitter page. It's hard for me to believe that she thinks this 1. is flattering or 2. doesn't make her look like she's got an extra chromosome or 3. even looks like her. I'm going to have nightmares about those hands.
Is she really as shallow and low-wattage as she seems? Signs increasingly point to YES.
7 comments:
What's with the uneven irises?
Ghoulish.
She looks cross-eyed. And those hands! The husband from "Family Guy" has more realistic hands!
MeMe isn't cross-eyed, Princess. That's eyes rattlin' loose 'round an empty skull.
Ugh. she's not goin' away, is she?
This doesn't surprise me. Meghan is horrible at picking out images to represent her. Have you seen her Twitter icon/Daily Beast photo? She looks like my trashy cousin from Reno who makes a living giving manicures in the basement of a Harrah's casino.
This illustration is the worst, though. I wonder if McCain himself drew it for her or something. That would be the only excuse for posting that pic.
I just went to her Twitter page to see if that is really her picture or if you doctored the eyes. I can't believe anyone would use that picture. The crossed eyes, the horrible hands and the weird cleavage--eww, what is wrong with her!?
Did you hear her get all fake flustery when she told Colbert she was pro-sex? OMG Dad's gonna watch this! Feh. Tramp.
On the other hand, on the off chance that she actually IS the GOP of the future, she's definitely less toothful and more bosomy than the GOP of the past. Which wouldn't be a bad thing.
I use lyrics from 30-year-old songs as my post titles because I am not clever enough to think up titles on my own. I don't even own an Ipod.
xoSMJ
Post a Comment