A reader writes:
Just a reminder of Oakeshott's view of Burke, from "On Being Conservative":
"And, in my opinion, there is more to be learnt about this disposition from Montaigne, Pascal, Hobbes and Hume than from Burke or Bentham."
And, furthermore, let us recall that Hayek rejected the term conservative. See his essay titled ..."Why I am not a Conservative."
Who talks like that?* 9 arcane academic references in one short note! My response to this is, basically, "Ajklfjsiohdiofhiodsklnglha." Seriously, can you imagine going up to some Mississippi tea partier and saying that to his face and expecting him to know what the hell you are talking about, much less respond to it?
*To be fair, lefty Matthew Yglesias talks like that all that time, too. Then again, nobody listens to him, either.
5 comments:
Ajklfjsiohdiofhiodsklnglha sounds like something you need to see the free clinic for.
OMG - I thought your cat walked across the keyboard. I see that same word all the time on my laptop!!!
Someone who really, really loves conservatism and political philosophy talks like that, that's who. Bless.
Sullivan's "flavor" of High-"C" conservatism is all his own -- a fragile or (one might even say) hallucinatory thing -- and sometimes it's interesting, but so often it seems to be essentially boiled down to "everything that's good that I like is automatically conservative."
As a concept, like I said, his vision is like some rare, exotic bird. Pretty much like the perfect GOP candidate they seem to be waiting for: so rare as to be mythical, like unicorns.
I just read Sully for the black-helicopter Palin theories.. and well View from your Window is fun too.. I nearly got the one from Amsterdam a few weeks ago.
And it's just empty references. Who knows what he means by any of it; if anyone could see by that list of name-drops that anything making sense could be derived.
I hate that pseudo-intellectual crap.
Post a Comment