Not much to say here, but I just had to feature the Washington Times' subtle illustration for their latest anti-homos-in-the-military editorial. I wonder why they went for such a low-key approach? Couldn't they have given Uncle Sam a more comely chapeau? Eyeshadow? Lipstick? What a missed opportunity.
Whatever. It turns out that allowing hairdressers in the military will totally destroy it. Neat!
5 comments:
Stupid Moonie rag. I thought they loved "no tolerance" policies, but I guess not if they're applied to hate crimes.
That seriously looks like something you'd receive in a crazy right-wing chain email.
Joining the military will make me yet more fabulous?! Sign me up!!
Is that the usual amount of rouge on Uncle Sam? (You're right, it's subtle.) And I agree with Samuel about wanting to be even more fabulous. Where can I be recruited?
Whatever. It turns out that allowing hairdressers in the military will totally destroy it. Neat!
Most perfect summation (and hopeful stinger) evah!
Post a Comment