tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11084955.post7121759582907912745..comments2023-12-04T15:03:06.845-05:00Comments on Princess Sparkle Pony's Photo Blog: Hairdo-Obsessed Blogs Suddenly Relevant Amidst the Ruins of John Edwards' CampaignPeteykinshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15960842777164948590noreply@blogger.comBlogger15125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11084955.post-29368144106075578612007-04-30T08:02:00.000-04:002007-04-30T08:02:00.000-04:00Arrr, he's cute even without hair.Laura Bush spent...Arrr, he's cute even without hair.<BR/><BR/>Laura Bush spent $700 for a reconfiguration? She got gypped!Saint Pathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00298965010639742246noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11084955.post-11722241051971211582007-04-29T10:12:00.000-04:002007-04-29T10:12:00.000-04:00>I'm not saying it's right that Edwards' hair is r...>I'm not saying it's right that Edwards' hair is ruining >his bid, I saying it's true.<BR/><BR/>That's exactly my view on the subject. It's stupid, but that's how it is.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11084955.post-83678131125454332612007-04-28T11:36:00.000-04:002007-04-28T11:36:00.000-04:00Zipdrive here...I personally do not care what a ca...Zipdrive here...<BR/><BR/>I personally do not care what a candidate spends my money on. If I like the person, they can spend it on weed for all I care.<BR/>Edwards is a pretty guy and I sorta like that he's vain. That metrosexual thing works for me.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11084955.post-43753254669855559922007-04-27T21:24:00.000-04:002007-04-27T21:24:00.000-04:00"I'm not saying it's right that Edwards' hair is r..."I'm not saying it's right that Edwards' hair is ruining his bid, I saying it's true."<BR/><BR/>Nah. I think we're talking about a primary that's being decided by an ever more sophisticated constituency. I realize you aren't happy about it -- you just think it's correct. I just don't think it'll matter all that much when people hit the booths. <BR/><BR/>On another note, if he comes across lukewarm again, at the next debate, I think he's going to be in some real trouble.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11084955.post-57632821900797999962007-04-27T18:20:00.000-04:002007-04-27T18:20:00.000-04:00Haircuts are a far more valid business expense tha...Haircuts are a far more valid business expense than, say, football tickets! However, a report in Salon says that he was seen buying gel from a Chapel Hill drugstore. On the one hand, everyone knows that "salon product" isn't all that different, but buying it does create more jobs for hairstylists.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09283122571671344629noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11084955.post-90277963882804854722007-04-27T14:48:00.000-04:002007-04-27T14:48:00.000-04:00I'm not saying it's right that Edwards' hair is ru...I'm not saying it's <I>right</I> that Edwards' hair is ruining his bid, I saying it's <I>true</I>.Peteykinshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15960842777164948590noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11084955.post-25886781835277999472007-04-27T13:18:00.000-04:002007-04-27T13:18:00.000-04:00Who gives a damn about haircut money? It does seem...Who gives a damn about haircut money? It does seem to me to be a campaign expensse, actually. Most campaign ads have all the depth of a haircut. I am never so thankful to be without cable and TV in general than I am during campaign season.<BR/><BR/>I do think that there are only so many creative snips that can go into hair that long, or short, in this case. But Hollywood people seem to feel taken advantage of if they're not taken advantage of.<BR/><BR/>Ho-fuckin'-hum.Lulu Maudehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03100523351881499282noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11084955.post-81193073544668203912007-04-27T12:00:00.000-04:002007-04-27T12:00:00.000-04:00While I agree with you that no one wants to listen...While I agree with you that no one wants to listen to anyone with a bad 'do, how crappy is it that a good-looking guy who has great ideas is going down in flames, while Tubby Fenderhair gets a bounce in the polls? Puh-lease. Come on, 'Merica, own up to your addiction to Product and go with The Hair!dguzmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01811101661607351661noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11084955.post-69301444738511016972007-04-27T11:09:00.000-04:002007-04-27T11:09:00.000-04:00Testify, my princess! Excellent commentary.Love, ...Testify, my princess! Excellent commentary.<BR/>Love, CarmenAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11084955.post-54665658641646427592007-04-27T10:15:00.000-04:002007-04-27T10:15:00.000-04:00Jess--The xanax factor is a separate issue... ima...Jess--<BR/><BR/>The xanax factor is a separate issue... imagine if she were that crazy but was under Bill Richardson's hair. What would her poll numbers look like then?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11084955.post-41127127798563869052007-04-27T10:13:00.000-04:002007-04-27T10:13:00.000-04:00And can you remember back to the Early days of the...And can you remember back to the Early days of the Clinton presidency, where Bill was criticized for getting a 200$ haircut, while aboard airforce one as it sat on the runway of some airport. The commentators were all, "it was too expensive AND it delayed the planes of all the blue-collared proletariat."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11084955.post-5560168236962482922007-04-27T10:01:00.000-04:002007-04-27T10:01:00.000-04:00Edith. I would like to delicately point out that ...Edith. I would like to delicately point out that Laura Crazy Eyes Bush paid Sally Hershberger $700 to reconfigure the brown helmet. Maybe there is a Xanax corollary to your theory?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11084955.post-38098272811145758252007-04-27T09:09:00.000-04:002007-04-27T09:09:00.000-04:00Both Richardson & Edwards realizing the importance...Both Richardson & Edwards realizing the importance of good hair correlates with my choosing the two of them as my faves of the Dem hopefuls. Even though Richardson was dismissive, his comments do show that he knows what people react to. <BR/><BR/>The tangent that I am currently working on is that anyone would be upset with Edwards spending that money on his hair. First: $400? With the money being spent on Presidential campaigns <I>anyway</I>? Second: echoing the Princess' point; nobody in this stupid country is gonna pay attention to anybody with a bad coiffure, no matter how good their ideas are or what their resume looks like. <BR/><BR/>So Bill: I know you're annoyed with the Senator, but you really oughtta take a lesson: New hair, new poll numbers -- trust me!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11084955.post-62315576101627742172007-04-26T23:44:00.000-04:002007-04-26T23:44:00.000-04:00I was hoping you would expand & expound on this.Th...I was hoping you would expand & expound on this.<BR/><BR/>There was a LOT of bad hair up there tonight, but Edwards' hair screams "I am very concerned about how my hair looks." Bad hair is kind of a given in politics. Edwards' sin is working so hard (or, uh, paying so many campaign-donation dollars) for stupid hair.<BR/><BR/>Also, Wonkette commenters were suggesting Richardson is wearing a rug. Ideas? I say hell no, he's had that same big-ass Freddy Fender hair for 20 years.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11084955.post-90893792556143270782007-04-26T22:36:00.000-04:002007-04-26T22:36:00.000-04:00There's waaay too much time left for the hairdo to...There's waaay too much time left for the hairdo to keep him from getting to the general. I think the reg'd dems realize there's too much at stake to let that kind of crap get in the way.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com